References

Ballor, J. J. (2005, April). Scholarship at the crossroads: The Journal of Markets & Morality case study. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 36(3), 145-165.

Banks, M. (2004, April). Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(2), 164-166.

Bates, M. E. (2006). Managing your information. Manuscript in preparation.

Campion, E. W., Curfman, G. D., & Drazen, J. M. (2000, November). Tracking the peer-review process [Editorial]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343(20), 1485-1486. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/343/20/1485

Coelho, R. J., & La Forge, J. (2000, April/May/June). Manuscript characteristics affect reveiwers' decisions for rehabilitation counseling related journals. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(2), 4-8.

Council of Science Editors. (2006). Scientific style and format: The CSE manual for authors, editors, and publishers (7th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. (n.d.). Retrieved May 1, 2006, from American Psychological Association Web site: http://www.apa.org/science/anguide.html

Guidelines on good publication practice. (n.d.). Retrieved May 1, 2006, from Committee on Publication Ethics Web site: http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines

Guterman, L. (2006, May 11). NIH has little to celebrate on 1st anniversary of its open-access policy, but changes may be on the way. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved May 16, 2006, from Chronicle of Higher Education database: http://chronicle.com/

Hawkins, D. T. (2005, January). Does open access publishing really work in practice? Information Today, 22(1), 40-41.

Heppner, P. P., & Heppner, M. J. (2004). Writing and publishing your thesis, dissertation, and research: A guide for students in the helping professions. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.

Ivry, S. (2006, May 8). Some publishers of scholarly journals dislike bill to require online access to articles. The New York Times. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from New York Times database: http://www.nytimes.com.

Kauffmann, F. (2004). Call the pros: Professional organizations’ recommendations on intellectual honesty. In The plagiarism plague: A resource guide and CD-ROM tutorial for educators and librarians (pp. 143-155). New York: Neal-Schuman.

Kaufman-Wills Group. (2005, October). The facts about open access: A study of the financial and non-financial effects of alternative business models for scholarly journals. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. Retrieved May 21, 2006, from http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub11.htm.

Luey, B. (1996, Spring). The librarian’s role in teaching academic authors about publishing procedures and ethics. Serials Review, 22(1). Retrieved January 16, 2006, from Ebsco database: http://search.epnet.com.

Miller, C. T., & Harris, J. (2004, January). Scholarly journal publications: Conflicting agendas for scholars, publishers, and institutions. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2), 73-91.

Nentwich, M. (2005, July). Quality control in academic publishing: Challenges in the age of cyberscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 3(3), 181-198.

Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2005, May). Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 179-181.

Palmquist, M. (2005). The Bedford researcher (2nd ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://www.bedfordstmartins.com.

Plutchak, T. S. (2005, October). The impact of open access. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(4), 419-421.

Pöschl, U. (2004, April). Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17(2), 105-113.

Richardson , M. (2005, April). ‘Author pays’ as new science publishing model [Letter to the editor]. British Medical Journal, 326, 765.

Suber, P. (2004, December 29). A very brief introduction to open access. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from Earlham College Web site: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm.

Thyer, B. (1994). Publishing in scholarly journals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wager, E., Godlee, F., & Jefferson, T. (2002). How to survive peer review. London: BMJ Books.

Why is plagiarism difficult to avoid? (n.d.). Retrieved April 30, 2006, from University of Maine at Farmington, Writing Center Web site: http://plagiarism.umf.maine.edu/difficult/html.

Yiotis, K. (2005, December). The Open Access Initiative: A new paradigm for scholarly communications. Information Technology & Libraries, 24(4), 157-162.

Zinsser, W. (2001). On writing well: The classic guide to writing nonfiction (5th ed.). Boston: HarperCollins.

Return to Top

• Introduction
• Module 1
  Overview of Scholarly Journal Publishing
  Module 1
  Overview of Scholarly Journal Publishing
  Publish or Perish The Scope and Purpose of this Tutorial Taking Your Place in the History of Scholarship Self Assessment Description of a Scholarly Journal An Overview of the Scholarly Publishing Process Roles in Scholarly Publishing Conflicts Among the Players Changing Business Models in Scholarly Publishing The Open Access Model Open Access Business Models The Impact of OA on Authors Types of Articles You can Propose and Publish Collaboration and its Discontents The Responsibilities of Authorship Managing Your Citations Learning About the World in which You Write Get Yourself a Mentor and a Friend Scholarly Publishing is a Long-distance Run What do You Know?
• Module 2
  Laying the Groundwork: Ideas, Journal Research & Queries
  Module 2
  Laying the Groundwork: Ideas, Journal Research & Queries
  Objectives Preparing to Publish - Idea Generation KISS: Keep It Simple; Streamline! Quiz: Are you a KISS-er? Discover Your Next Article Focus Your Ideas Identify Appropriate Scholarly Journals Consult Disciplinary Journal Guides Review Reference Lists and Bibliographies Use Academic Journal Indices Talk to Your Colleagues Balancing Impact with Acceptance Rates Measuring Impact Circulation Figures The Nuances of Journal Characteristics Journal Queries Sending a Query Response Times and Next Steps Progress with Profiling Concept Review
• Module 3
  Deadlines & Details - Manuscript Prep & Submission
  Module 3
  Deadlines & Details - Manuscript Prep & Submission
  Objectives The Research Context Searching the Literature Resources for Searching the Literature The Literature Search as a Non-Linear Process Recording and Organizing Your Information The Writing Process: Overview and Tips Practical Elements of the Writing Process University of Colorado Writing Centers Writing Resources on the Web Understanding Your Disciplinary Style Ethical Issues in Research and Writing Avoiding Plagiarism Other Ethical Pitfalls Using Human Subjects and Animals in Research Attribution of Authorship Obtaining Permission to Use Copyrighted Material Following Instructions for Authors Next Steps: Colleague Review Submitting Your Manuscript Manuscript Checklist Summary and Review
• Module 4
  From Good to Great - The Editorial Process
  Module 4
  From Good to Great - The Editorial Process
  Objectives Submitting a Manuscript Types of Peer Review Masked and Open Reviews The Care and Management of Manuscripts Making the Cut Entering the Review Zone Peer Review Quiz Reviewer Considerations in Evaluating Manuscripts Waiting for Responses Making the Most of In-Between Times What to Expect When You're Expecting Feedback Rejection is Never Fun Requests for Resubmission with Revisions Revision, Revision, Revision Resubmitting your Manuscript You've Been Accepted! Now What? The Production Process Creating Your 'Need to Know' List The A to Z of the Review and Editorial Process
• Module 5
  Making it Yours - Customizing Your Publishing Plan
  Module 5
  Making it Yours - Customizing Your Publishing Plan
  Objectives From Overwhelmed to on Top of it All Identify Where You Want to Go Of Index Cards and Spiral Notebooks Low-Tech Solutions Going for Technology Best Practices in Sustaining Creative Development Continuing Your Education Mastering Scholarly Publishing